25 August 2026 · 5 min read

PPAP vs FAIR: differences in drawing ballooning and dimensional documentation

Both PPAP (automotive) and FAIR AS9102 (aerospace) require a ballooned drawing. What are the concrete differences in ballooning, Form 3, and documentation requirements?

Two standards, one common need: the ballooned drawing

Whether you work in automotive (PPAP AIAG) or aerospace (FAIR AS9102), you must produce a ballooned drawing with corresponding dimensional results. But the precise requirements differ significantly between the two sectors.

For a full overview of both standards, visit ppap-fai.approche-qualite.fr, the PPAP/FAIR/APQP expert guide.

Key differences: PPAP vs FAIR dimensional documentation

CriteriaPPAP Element 9FAIR Form 3 AS9102
Parts inspectedSample (min. 30 for Run@Rate)1 representative part
Characteristic coverage100% of drawing characteristics100% of drawing characteristics
Capability requiredCpk ≥ 1.33 / Ppk ≥ 1.67Not required in Form 3
Measurement deviceTo record (MSA required separately)To record in Form 3
Table formatFree (AIAG-compliant)Standardised AS9102 Form 3

BullePlan: one tool for both PPAP and FAIR

BullePlan generates dimensional results tables compatible with both PPAP Element 9 and AS9102 Form 3: customisable Excel export for your customer templates, and normalised AS9102 PDF Form 3, with AI-assisted ballooning to ensure no characteristic is missed.

Try BullePlan for free

3 Form 3 exports included — no sign-up required.

Get started →